charlesnaismith: (Default)

G: 2 stars - Some interesting ideas, I quite like the Harry Mudd character. Plot was ok but required a heap of suspension of disbelief. The beginning was too much of a rail road and the resolution was lame. The initial period on the planet and interaction with Mudd were pretty good though.

 

C: 3 stars - .It was different, I kind of liked it. Why does the sexism have to be a plot point. It didn't feel too slow.

 

Plot Summary: Hijacked ship,  crew captured and have to figure out a crazy plan to escape from Harry Mudd and his many androids.


 

Index of TOS Reviews

charlesnaismith: (Default)

 

G: 1 stars - Possibly the worst Star Trek episode I have ever seen.

 

C: 0 stars - I will never get that hour of my life back. Not even an interesting idea, just magic and a bad plot.

 

Plot Summary: Lost landing party. Full command cast visit surface for rescue and get lost/captured by godlike entity. Halloween haunted house style.

 

Index of TOS Reviews



charlesnaismith: (Default)

 

G: 5 stars - Great episode, the plot was interesting, everyone was in character and there were some great interactions between Spock, Commodore Decker, Kirk and the rest of the crew. Commodore Decker is a great character, whose actions show what felt like very realistic bias. Nice to see Kirk wield tools when necessary too.

 

C: 4.5 stars - Exceedingly weak end banter, genuinely illogical decisions by the commodore, enjoyable interactions to get rid of an interfering outside officer. I liked the problem solving parts and there were a variety of them where everyone was competent at their jobs. This one felt like a next gen episode.

charlesnaismith: (Default)

 

G: 2 stars - Yet another episode in which an implacable force pulls the enterprise slowly into a planet. The kooky inhabitants were mildly amusing and the plot overall didn't contradict itself. The premise could have been quite interesting if they hadn't erased the history of the people they met. Why the antagonist existed and what had happened to create the society they encountered would have been much more interesting to find out. Basically I wanted more archeology and sociology.

Favourite lines: Kirk "We come in peace", kooky inhabitant "You struck me?".

 

C: 2 stars - weak ending banter, borderline episode between 2 and 3. Pacing was good, and I did want to find out what happened. It was just disappointing that it finished in the same way as "Who Mourns for Adonais " did.

charlesnaismith: (Default)

 

G: 4 stars - a classic episode, where the characters all followed their own motivations. Particularly enjoyable seeing the different ways the characters were inverted for the mirror universe. I liked how Kirk et al, had to improv their way through the various evil situations and also would not sacrifice their principles.


C: 4 stars - would have been a 5 but for the slow start and irritating season 2 intro music. The love interest had some real motivations and an interesting role to play in the story. I like the conversation between alt Spock and Kirk at the end. Solid ending, and interesting characters - pity about the torture.
 

Both of us: Fight scene choreography was great - way better than most modern fight scenes.
charlesnaismith: (Default)

G: 3 stars - The episode follows it's own internal logic and at no point does using force work to solve their problems. They have to reason out a plan and continue think on their feet as circumstances change. Some events are a bit naff, and extremely dated, which is why it isn't a 4.

 

C: 3 stars - The banter at the end brings this up from a 2. Best end of episode banter yet.


charlesnaismith: (Durer)

 

We have been watching Star Trek together for about 18 months now. Starting with TNG and now on TOS. I was able to get into it thanks to the viewing order recommandations on LetsWatchStarTrek. Unfortunately, our reviews and theirs are increasingly different. So C and I will do our own!

 

Below is the master list of TOS that we will gradually review and update. We are using the rating system from LetsWatchStarTrek, which is as follows:

1 = Bad. Only for the most dedicated fans.
2 = A mediocre episode, possibly worth skipping if new to Star Trek.
3 = Good! Generally enjoyable, worth watching if new to Star Trek.
4 = Great! An example of why we love Star Trek.
5 = One of the best. A classic.

Ratings will be listed C's rating | G's rating ie. 5|5 - we both thought it was awesome, 1|5 C hated it and G loved it.

Season One

The Man Trap Rating:
Charlie X Rating:
Where No Man Has Gone Before Rating:
The Naked Time Rating:
The Enemy Within Rating:
Mudd’s Women Rating:
What Are Little Girls Made Of? Rating:
Miri Rating:
Dagger of the Mind Rating:
The Corbomite Maneuver Rating:
The Menagerie, Part 1 Rating:
The Menagerie, Part 2 Rating:
The Conscience of the King Rating:
Balance of Terror Rating:
Shore Leave Rating:
The Galileo Seven Rating:
The Squire of Gothos Rating:
Arena Rating:
Tomorrow Is Yesterday Rating:
Court Martial Rating:
The Return of the Archons Rating:
Space Seed Rating:
A Taste of Armageddon Rating:
This Side of Paradise Rating:
The Devil in the Dark Rating:
Errand of Mercy Rating:
The Alternative Factor Rating:
The City on the Edge of Forever Rating:
Operation: Annihilate! Rating:

Season Two

Amok Time, Rating: 2|1 - some good moments but pretty bad overall
Who Mourns for Adonais, Rating: 3|2 - some bizarre and of it's time sexist banter, the plot was reasonable and the characters actions mean something
The Changeling, Rating: 3|3
Mirror, Mirror, Rating: 4|4
The Apple, Rating: 2|2
The Doomsday Machine, Rating: 4.5|5
Catspaw Rating:  1|0
I, Mudd Rating: 3|2
Metamorphosis Rating: -9001|1
Journey to Babel Rating: 4 (if edited)|4
Friday’s Child Rating:  3.5|3
The Deadly Years Rating: 3.5|3
Obsession Rating: 3|2
Wolf in the Fold Rating: 3|3
The Trouble With Tribbles Rating: 1|3
The Gamesters of Triskelion Rating: 0|1
A Piece of the Action Rating: 3|3.5
The Immunity Syndrome Rating: 5|3
A Private Little War Rating: 0|2
Return to Tomorrow Rating: 2|1
Patterns of Force Rating: 0|1
By Any Other Name Rating: 4|3.5
The Omega Glory Rating: 0|1
The Ultimate Computer Rating: 0.5|2
Bread and Circuses Rating: 1|1
Assignment: Earth Rating: 2|2

Season Three

Spock’s Brain Rating:
The Enterprise Incident Rating:
The Paradise Syndrome Rating:
And The Children Shall Lead Rating:
Is There in Truth No Beauty? Rating:
Spectre of the Gun Rating:
Day of the Dove Rating:
For the World is Hollow… Rating:
The Tholian Web Rating:
Plato’s Stepchildren Rating:
Wink of an Eye Rating:
The Empath Rating:
Elaan of Troyius Rating:
Whom Gods Destroy Rating:
Let That Be Your Last Battlefield Rating:
The Mark of Gideon Rating:
That Which Survives Rating:
The Light of Zetar Rating:
Requiem for Methuselah Rating:
The Way to Eden Rating:
The Cloud Minders Rating:
The Savage Curtain Rating
All Our Yesterdays Rating:
Turnabout Intruder Rating:
 


charlesnaismith: (Default)
When Shrove Tuesday rolled around at school many years ago. The parents would come in and cook pancakes with lemon and sugar. Buckwheat pancakes featured prominently to which I and my school mates would respond "what the fuck is this shit".

Today I made myself buckwheat galettes (pancakes) and ate them with lemon and sugar, my feeling about the food? "this is fucking great".

I really like buckwheat pancakes.
charlesnaismith: (Default)
Eric Flint is one of my favourite authors, and today I found out that he died in July this year.
 
He wrote alternate history, and military SF, and focused on social and progressive themes. In his writing, all the characters had goals and values that made sense and were justified.
 
I felt like he understood that the past was a different place and that the people in it thought differently to those of today, and he did this without judging those people for that difference.
 
It is easy to feel possessive about the things you create and to attempt to control and restrict them once you have made them. Eric flint knew that capitalism and sales are just a way to get paid as an author, he wasn't attached to them as a tool. So you can read many of his books for free to get you sucked in 😉

He released his books DRM free and helped many, many authors to write in his alternate history universe. These collaborations made that universe feel real and full in a way that one author could never do.

TL:DR Great author dies and it's sad. You should go and read some of his books - they're free!
Official memorial post from the publisher he founded -
charlesnaismith: (Default)

I watched a very useful language learning video today -

https://youtu.be/B-KZXmCMLMU

How to learn a language by reading stories
 

  • Spend 50% of your language study time reading
  • read at the right level for you i.e. 90-95% comprehension or on average you recognise 9 out of 10 words.
  • read all the way through a chapter, then reread the chapter 2-4 times as necessary. The first one you aim to figure out the gist of what is going on, later rereads are to understand more fully and figure out what some words mean from context
  • don't look anything up until the 2nd or 3rd reread, and only look up a word if it appears 5 times or more, and you still don't know what it means
  • make a note of any new vocab that seems particularly useful/interesting (at most 3-4 words per page)
  • your goal is to make a habit of reading for pleasure in your target language, so keep going and don't worry if you don't get everything - going over the same bit again won't help.
  • If you keep getting stuck choose an easier text
charlesnaismith: (Default)
"to obtain 7 hours of sleep duration, an average healthy adult will need to be in bed for (i.e. have a sleep opportunity of) ~8 hours and 15 minutes."

https://sleepdiplomat.wordpress.com/
charlesnaismith: (Default)

A dear friend and personal mentor died suddenly last week, in a road accident on his bike. I’m still shocked and sad about it. I’ve known Elephant all my life and he was one of my first employers. He was an absolutely unique person with a unique personality and unique way of communicating and I used to serve as a sort of translator between elephants and humans (his words) because I had learnt how to understand his nuances better than most and to communicate that to other people.


He was a friend of my dad’s I saw occasionally and didn’t really get to know until I was a young adult. My first adult interaction with him was when we went and stayed at his house in country Victoria and he invited me to come and stay for a weekend to learn about compound interest, and how to make an income by loaning cash to cafes to buy coffee machines. This was the first of a never ending series of schemes he would cook up - I even followed through on a few of these schemes but he was never offended when I declined almost all of them.


I worked for him on and off for nearly a decade and he helped me to set up my first business as a handyman and odd job guy. He got me to do all sorts of odd jobs, fitting out their retail shop in a factory in Fitzroy (tiling, painting, cleaning, carpentry, heavy lifting), staying at his house in Allansford for a building project, and working on his house in Clifton Hill - I fixed the stumps, replaced weatherboards, installed a skylight and cleaned the place in between tenants. He believed in me as an 18 year old working on the tools with no prior skills. 


The people I worked with were a completely varied lot too. Some different friends of mine who I brought in, wwoofers, and random people who met Jon and owed him favours. My best friend Ben and I did a heap of work for the Elephant together. Ben would want to talk about philosophy while we worked and Elephant got such a kick out of showing off the two labourers replacing weatherboards while discussing ethics or the social construction of gender.


Elephant worked very hard all the time - I don’t think he knew how to be unproductive. When he wanted a break he would cook (he taught me how to make israeli salad), go for a bike ride, or play checkers with his wife Marion (also known as the Bird of Paradise). He valued his time and made sure that his clients did too - often they would call him desperate for some help and calm before an exam, he would happily work in the middle of the night. He used to get me to come and do heavy lifting for him very early in the morning until I realised that I too could charge more for the times I’d prefer to be asleep. 


He respected my needs, and didn’t expect anything from me that I wasn’t happy to do. In our working relationship just as much as in our friendship. He didn’t do ‘friends with obligations’ - if he got to catch up he was happy and his hugs were great. When he could he would come and visit me and was always happy just to enjoy a chat before he got back on his bike and rode somewhere else. Usually before coming he would ring up and ask if we need any milk or bread, you could ask for any random groceries or some dip (which he made in copious quantities), he would have it with him when he arrived.


He chose his identity and played it to the hilt. He was Jewish, an absolute back of a napkin schemer, didn’t understand “Humans”, and got very angry when he got stuffed around.

The anger stuff had been a big problem for him when he worked as a bankruptcy lawyer, he got super stressed and eventually drama went down and he was wrongfully disbarred. A decade later he was vindicated but chose to stay out of the profession. The more stress was removed from his life the more fun he was to be around. Though I must admit I always enjoyed being the calm one when he let loose with a tirade in Arabic (he spoke German, Hebrew, Indonesian and I don’t even know what else) on someone who had wronged him. 


Being Jewish was important to him and also something that he would perform as a joke. Going down to the ghetto (Caulfield) to pick up Israeli backpackers to work for him. Often we would go out to lunch on Brunswick St in Fitzroy and once he came back with pizza to which he tucked in with gusto, when I pointed out that the pizza had ham on it he practiced conjugating Hebrew verbs as penance for his mistake. He visited Israel many times to study Hebrew, and almost never worked on the Sabbath, and if you saw his hair because he forgot his hat, he would apologize like he had walked in on you in the shower.

His schemes were all about making money or making the world a better place, or both. He was committed to making the world a better place, with a focus on affordable housing and the environment. I remember one of the more recent ones had him talking to the state minister for housing about building super energy efficient affordable townhouses on some land in the country - sadly I don’t know if this was finished or not.


I learnt so much from him. Most importantly that I could do anything, he would always say “I don’t care how you do it, as long as it gets done” his other catchphrase when we were taking on a new project was “you’re an engineer, you can do it” -- I am in fact not an engineer, I was an engineering student and I never completed a professional engineering qualification. I learnt that for most things if you had a crap go, you would probably get a good enough result and if it didn’t work you could always try again or fix it when it broke. Since then I’ve learnt more about using the right tool for the job and how a bit more planning can get you a better result but I needed to learn to just try first.


Jon was my friend, he was the Elephant, and I miss him.

charlesnaismith: (Default)
I read Goliath by Neil Gaiman recently.

It's a fun short story set in the universe of the Matrix. Can be hard to find though. I found a listing of his work here - https://neilgaimanbibliography.com/shortstories.html

Another fun story was a fanfic continuation of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory - it reads as if it were a sequel written by Phillip K Dick -https://www.fanfiction.net/s/13451176/1/Chili-and-the-Chocolate-Factory-Fudge-Revelation


I am always reading something so it's kind of fun to write about that. Planning to keep posting about whatever I have read and am enjoying.
charlesnaismith: (Default)
I went to the dentist yesterday and he told me two factoids that I didn't know already.

1. the bacteria in your mouth that cause tooth decay live a somewhat independent existence to the presence of food in your mouth. So when you brush your tooth you aren't really doing it to remove food from your teeth, you're brushing to remove the bacteria (plaque).

2. the bacteria only release acid that damages your teeth when you eat sugar and they release the same amount of acid even with very low amounts of sugar. So you want to avoid repeated exposures, but if you have a lot of sugar at once it is no worse, for your teeth, than a small amount of sugar.

So it is actually better for you teeth to brush them before meals, and to avoid snacking on stuff with sugar in it. I will be brushing my teeth when I get up in the morning from now on.
charlesnaismith: (Default)

 My dream this morning was a surprisingly tight narrative story:

 

Classic son of previously in power family still enjoys some wealth and privilege. We see that all the privileged people live in huge, old homes with art deco interiors, and wear classic double breasted suits, or dresses from the same era.

Flashback to protagonist being shown secrets by father that are accessible from many of the upper class houses. A rope lowers and you can be pulled to a cold area with view of a black void surrounding the outside of the house and a view of the houses from the outside - streamlined futuristic vessels tesselated together into a giant impermeable cone . If other people know about this no one talks about it.

The protagonist (P) sees a dissident being taken away by security forces. The weapons used are T-shaped hammers propelled by compressed air, possibly with wire so they can be pulled back and fired again. They also have tiny tanks that push crowds around with big brooms.

He spends time outside and you can see the green grasses, the clouds, the blue sky, and the gentle upward curve of the ground in the distance.

A member of the ruling trio is attacked and maybe killed, which precipitates a small riot/mob. P sees this and looks into what the dissident was looking into.

P's friend from a similar background is taken away for unspecified crimes. P takes the opportunity to stay at the friends family home and snoops into what the friend was doing. Sees that the friend cleverly covered the face of someone else on his computer with another photo, P uncovers this and now knows who a key member of the ruling cabal is and what they are hiding.

Before P can expose the ruling cabal's secrets, while outside, the ground shakes. The individual vessels separate and everyone is sucked into whichever vessel they are standing on or left outside to die. P manages to make it into the vessel under the grass, and from there somehow to the interior of one of the upper class houses.

Later on, we see the vessel he is in, rising out of the water and quickly floating along the flat surface of a large body of water. Nearby on the shore we see ruined walls and buildings, as well as trees and plants but no animals or people. The buildings must have inhabited relatively recently (50-100 years) because you can still see some graffiti spray painted on the sides.

 

Then I woke up.

 

 

 

good book

Jan. 12th, 2021 09:57 am
charlesnaismith: (Default)
If you liked the early Honor Harringtons. These are a return to form. David Weber just needs a coauthor to enforce proper editing (and cut the dull religious bits).

The hero can't handle the chaos of life so he joins the space navy, where he can obsessively read the rulebooks and know what is supposed to happen at all times.

I have been meaning to read the star wars stuff by timothy zahn too. Together they can write some great space battles.

Talk to me about good (and so bad it's impressive) books. I miss talking with human beings ;)

https://www.baen.com/categories/books-by-series-list/manticore-ascendant-series-by-david-weber-and-timothy-zahn.html
charlesnaismith: (Edward Elric)

I made the best scones yet last night. I followed the recipe below but had to leave the dough alone for an hour and half before we could bake them. They came out super fluffy and yum :)

 

The CWA Show scone recipe:
3 cups of flour
6 teaspoons of baking powder
1/2 cup of cream
between 1 and 1 1/2 cups of milk (add a cup first and see how your dough forms)
a pinch of salt.

If working by hand cut the cream and milk into the flour and work into a dough, or
place all ingredients into the mixer bowl and gently mix with a bench mixer.

Once you have a nice, slightly sticky dough that you can still manipulate easily, place onto a floured surface and cut into squares of your preferred size

Roughly 10 minutes of baking time in a hot oven (220-230C), or until cooked to taste.

Scones!

May. 6th, 2020 10:18 am
charlesnaismith: (Default)
Scones cooked with A on  6-5-20

This is a good way to entertain yourself and a small child, and get some kitchen cleaning done.


Results and thoughts for next time
The scones rose well but tasted too salty and a little pasty/gluey in the mouth. Crumb and flakiness was good.

For next time: no or less salt; maybe less butter; maybe no egg and more milk as that is more traditional.  Put the scones in the oven after boiling the kettle and getting the whipped cream ready. Make sure you have a good jam for scones (ours was low sugar, which wasn't ideal).


Recipe

3 cups plain flour (375 g)
6 teaspoons baking powder
150 grams butter
1 egg
1/2 +- cup milk to make the right consistency
squeeze of lemon juice
¼ tsp salt

  • Heat oven to 220C/fan 200C/regular.
  • flour into a large bowl with salt and baking powder, then mix.
  • Add butter cubed, then rub in with your fingers until the mix looks like fine crumbs
  • Mix the egg and milk in a small bowl
  • add lemon juice, then set aside for a moment.
  • Make a well in the dry mix, then add the liquid and combine it quickly  – it will seem pretty wet at first.
  • Scatter some flour onto the work surface and tip the dough out. Dredge the dough and your hands with a little more flour, then fold the dough over 2-3 times until it’s a little smoother. Pat into a round about 4cm deep.
  • Cut into squares or rounds as you like. Brush the tops with milk, then carefully place onto the baking tray.
  • Bake for 10 mins until risen and golden on the top.

Profile

charlesnaismith: (Default)
charlesnaismith

December 2024

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
222324252627 28
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags